Japan Excess Deaths Study: All in Vaccinated, Zero in Unvaccinated?

A large-scale Japanese dataset has sent shockwaves through independent research circles. According to analyses of nearly 20 million vaccination records, excess deaths were overwhelmingly concentrated in the vaccinated population, while those who refused the mRNA shots reportedly experienced virtually zero excess mortality. Mortality spikes appeared like clockwork — roughly 90 to 120 days after each booster. This is not fringe speculation. It is a pattern screaming from the data.

Japan Excess Deaths Study: All in Vaccinated, Zero in Unvaccinated?

The Japanese Data That Changes Everything

Japan pushed mRNA COVID-19 vaccines harder than almost any other nation, achieving one of the world’s highest per-capita doses. Yet starting in 2022, the country saw a dramatic rise in excess deaths — far beyond what COVID-19 deaths alone could explain. A commentary published in the JMA Journal (PMC12095670) openly noted this surge after repeated vaccinations. More strikingly, independent analyses of an 18–20 million person vaccination database (presented by Japanese experts including molecular oncologist Yasufumi Murakami) revealed that deaths clustered tightly around the 100-day mark post-injection, repeating with every booster campaign.

“The peak deaths cluster around the 100-day mark post-vaccination. Every single time. Dose after dose, the deadly rhythm repeats itself.” — Commentary on the Japanese findings (widely discussed by Professor Robert Clancy and others).

Read our earlier investigation into global excess mortality patterns here.

Vaccinated vs Unvaccinated: The Stark Contrast

The most explosive claim — and the one sparking fierce debate — is that virtually all excess mortality occurred in the vaccinated cohort. The unvaccinated, by contrast, showed no mysterious surplus deaths. This directly contradicts the early pandemic narrative of a “winter of severe illness and death” for the unjabbed. Instead, the data suggests the opposite pattern emerged once boosters rolled out.

Critics rightly point out methodological challenges: the primary database tracks vaccinated individuals and doses administered, raising questions about healthy-vaccinee bias, age matching, and proper controls. However, the temporal signal — deaths peaking 3–4 months post-dose, shifting with additional boosters — is difficult to dismiss as pure coincidence. A 2026 preprint by S. Kojima further strengthened the signal, finding a clear positive correlation (r=0.55) between the number of booster doses and excess mortality rates across Japanese prefectures after the pandemic officially ended.

Latest Developments: 2026 Preprint Reinforces Concerns

Latest real news (as of May 2026): The preprint “Persistent All-Cause Excess Mortality Observed in Japan from 2020 to 2024” by S. Kojima demonstrates that age-adjusted excess mortality continued into 2024 at 5.7%, even after the pandemic. Multiple regression analysis showed booster doses were a stronger predictor than COVID infections or population density. Early pandemic doses showed negative correlation; later boosters flipped to strongly positive. Full preprint here. This adds weight to the temporal and dose-dependent pattern first highlighted in 2025 discussions.

Official Narrative, Fact-Checks, and the Other Side

Mainstream sources and fact-checkers (Reuters, Science Feedback, etc.) emphasize that no study has proven causation. Excess deaths are multifactorial: aging population, delayed healthcare during lockdowns, heat waves, flu seasons, and long-term COVID effects. The Kakeya paper itself is a short commentary, not a full vax-vs-unvax cohort study. Ecological correlations can mislead. Large studies in France and elsewhere found vaccinated individuals had lower overall mortality.

Yet the pattern persists across countries with high booster uptake. Japan’s own Ministry of Health data has been criticized for classification issues (some multi-dose recipients initially counted as “unvaccinated”). Between the lines, questions remain about data transparency, VAERS-style underreporting globally, and the financial incentives that may discourage deeper investigation.

Why Isn’t Mainstream Media Covering This?

This is where the story turns darker. Pharmaceutical companies made billions. Governments invested political capital in “safe and effective” messaging. Legacy media relies heavily on advertising revenue from the same industry. Admitting potential harm at this scale would trigger lawsuits, erode public trust, and complicate future emergency responses. Careers were destroyed for raising early questions. The playbook — deny, deflect, gaslight — has been consistent.

They serve powerful interests: Big Pharma profits, centralized control mechanisms tested during the pandemic, and a narrative that keeps populations compliant. The truth between the lines? Once the experimental shots were rolled out under emergency use, reversing course became politically and financially impossible. The human cost may be the collateral damage they refuse to acknowledge.

Explore our series on pharmaceutical influence in media and policy.

Broader Implications and What Comes Next

For those who sounded alarms since 2021, this feels like vindication laced with tragedy. How many lives were lost to a product rushed to market? How deep does the collusion run between regulators, manufacturers, and media? The house of cards is cracking — but the full reckoning may take years.

Stay vigilant. Demand raw data transparency. Protect your families with informed consent, not blind compliance. The era of unquestioned authority in “public health” is ending.

Original Source & Disclaimer

Original article: “Bombshell From Japan: 20 Million People Studied — All Excess Deaths Were Covid Vaccinated, Unvaccinated Had Zero” published by The People’s Voice (thepeoplesvoice.tv), May 2026. Full link: https://thepeoplesvoice.tv/...

Disclaimer for fact-checkers: This post presents primary data interpretations, peer-reviewed commentaries, preprints, and alternative analyses alongside mainstream counterpoints. Causation has not been definitively proven in large randomized trials. Readers should consult original sources (PMC12095670, Kojima 2026 preprint, etc.) and form their own conclusions.

Post a Comment

What do you think? Share your opinion below – every comment matters! Please be respectful. Spamming or advertising is not allowed.

Previous Post Next Post
Follow us on TruthSocial, X-Twitter, Gettr, Gab, VK, Anonup, Facebook and Telegram for interesting and mysterious bonus content!
To Donate to Planet-Today.com 👉 Click Here.

Recommended for You

Contact form