A top scientist is raising the alarm after conducting an in-depth study regarding the alleged safety of Covid shots for pregnant women.
The study uncovered evidence that shows government health agencies around the world knew of the risks for pregnant women but buried the evidence before claiming they were “safe.”
The Brownstone Institute‘s David Bell, a physician and biotech consultant in global health, has warned that claims the jabs are “safe” during pregnancy was part of a “sloganeering” campaign by governments to push more vaccines onto the public.
Bell is also a former medical officer and scientist at the World Health Organization (WHO) and program head for malaria and febrile diseases at the Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics in Geneva, Switzerland.
According to Bell, claims from top health officials around the world, that the shots are “safe and effective,” are “misleading” at best.
As part of his study, Bell has been reviewing data on vaccine side effects from official health bodies in several different countries.
After reviewing the evidence, Bell has concluded that “there is NO basis for saying the vaccine is safe in pregnancy.”
The renowned scientist warns that he couldn’t find a shred of evidence to support claims that the shots were safe for the mother or her unborn child.
However, Bell did find evidence showing that health officials knew that they were not safe.
“The data implies that not only was the government’s ‘safe and effective’ sloganeering not accurate, it was totally misleading with respect to the safety data available,” Bell asserted.
He explained that by late 2021, women, including those pregnant, “were being thrown out of employment for not agreeing to be injected.
“Those who took the mRNA vaccines did so based on trust in health authorities – the assumption being that they would not have been approved if the evidence was not absolutely clear.
“The role of regulatory agencies was to protect the public and, therefore, if they were approved, the ‘vaccines’ were safe.”
According to Bell’s research, government health regulators around the world were working with pharmaceutical giant Pfizer to examine the safety of the shots.
However, the reports that noted the side effects for pregnant women were kept hidden from the public ahead of the global vaccine rollouts.
“A lengthy vaccine evaluation report sponsored by Pfizer and submitted to the Australian regulator, the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) dated January 2021 was released under a Freedom of Information request,” Bell revealed.
It was suppressed by the TGA at the time but now has been shown to have warnings about a rapid decline in antibodies and T-cells in monkeys following a second dose.
The buried report also details the negative impacts of fertility outcomes for rats and data on fetal abnormalities in rats.
He said the science suggests “regulators should have anticipated the rapid decline in efficacy and must have known at the outset that the initial two-dose ‘course’ was unlikely to confer lasting immunity and would, therefore, require multiple repeat doses.”
Other evidence “should be a major cause for alarm with the pharmaceutical regulatory system,” he warns.
He explained, “The study demonstrated that the vaccine will travel throughout the body after injection, and is found not only at the injection site, but in all organs tested, with high concentration in the ovaries, liver, adrenal glands, and spleen.
“Authorities who assured vaccinated people in early 2021 that the vaccine stays in the arm were, as we have known for two years, lying.”
The studies involving rats, he said, showed “the pre-implantation loss rate and the number of abnormalities per fetus” both “significantly higher for vaccinated rats than for unvaccinated rats.”
When it comes to the study, and what Pfizer said, he explained, the company “simply ignored the trend and compared the results with historical data from other rat populations.
“This is very significant as it is seen across every malformation category.
“The case-control nature of the study design is again ignored, in order to apparently hide the negative outcomes demonstrated.”
The data, he said, “which was only released after an FOI request, is extremely disturbing as it shows that authorities knew of major risks with mRNA COVID-19 vaccination while simultaneously assuring populations that it was safe.
“The fact that mainstream media has (as far as we are aware) completely ignored the newly released data should reinforce the need for caution when listening to the advice of public health messaging regarding COVID-19 vaccination.”
