Report Reveals the Alarming Reason Why Bud Light and Nike are Shoving “Transgender” Dylan Mulvaney in America’s Face
byPlanet Today-
0
Almost no one in America had ever heard of Dylan Mulvaney, a
biological male pretending to be female before this year. Now he is
suddenly all over the news.
The reason behind his sudden emergence is chilling. The New York Post
exclusively revealed that The Human Rights Campaign, the forefront of
the leftist LGBTQ mafia, is utilizing a social credit score to force
companies like Nike and Anheuser-Busch to either advance their poisonous
agenda.
These are precisely the tactics Chinese Communist Party (CCP)
pulls with their citizens and companies when they say or do something
contrary to the CCP’s mission.
In addition, the HRC publicly threatens organizations every year by
sending a list of demands in person over what they want displayed in
public. Clearly, Mulvaney was part of those marching orders.
The HRC is backed by hedge funds such as Blackrock and
Vanguard, the top shareholders of most American publicly-traded
corporations. Failure to advance the woke agenda would lead to these
companies pulling their funds from Nike, Anheuser-Busch, and other major
companies, leading to the loss of millions of dollars.
All of this means that major corporations actually lose more by not
embracing the woke left than from angering conservatives. So much for
the “get woke, go broke” slogan.
Executives at companies like Nike, Anheuser-Busch and
Kate Spade, whose brand endorsements have turned controversial trans
influencer Dylan Mulvaney into today’s woke “It girl,” aren’t just
virtue signaling.
They’re handing out lucrative deals to what were once considered
fringe celebrities because they have to — or risk failing an
all-important social credit score that could make or break their
businesses.
At stake is their Corporate Equality Index — or CEI — score, which is
overseen by the Human Rights Campaign, the largest LGBTQ+ political
lobbying group in the world.
HRC, which has received millions from George Soros’ Open Society
Foundation among others, issues report cards for America’s biggest
corporations via the CEI: awarding or subtracting points for how well
companies adhere to what HRC calls its “rating criteria.”
The HRC lists five major rating criteria, each with its own lengthy
subsets, for companies to gain — or lose — CEI points. The main
categories are: “Workforce Protections,” “Inclusive Benefits,”
“Supporting an Inclusive Culture,” “Corporate Social Responsibility and
Responsible Citizenship.”
Credit: New York Post
A company can lose CEI points if it doesn’t fulfill HRC’s demand for
“integration of intersectionality in professional development,
skills-based or other training” or if it doesn’t use a “supplier
diversity program with demonstrated effort to include certified LGBTQ+
suppliers.”
James Lindsay, a political podcaster who runs a site called New
Discourses, told The Post that the Human Rights campaign administers the
CEI ranking “like an extortion racket, like the Mafia.
It doesn’t just sit back passively either. HRC sends representatives
to corporations every year telling them what kind of stuff they have to
make visible at the company. They give them a list of demands and if
they don’t follow through there’s a threat that you won’t keep your CEI
score.”
As a result, some American CEOs are more concerned about pleasing
BlackRock, Vanguard and State Street Bank — who are among the top
shareholders of most American publicly-traded corporations (including
Nike, Anheuser-Busch and Kate Spade) — than they are about irritating
conservatives, numerous sources told The Post.
“The big fund managers like BlackRock all embrace this ESG orthodoxy
in how they apply pressure to top corporate management teams and boards
and they determine, in many cases, executive compensation and bonuses
and who gets re-elected or re-appointed to boards,” entrepreneur Vivek
Ramaswamy, who is running for president as a Republican and authored
“Woke Inc.: Inside America’s Social Justice Scam,” told The Post. “They
can make it very difficult for you if you don’t abide by their agendas.”
In 2018, BlackRock CEO Larry Fink, who oversees assets worth $8.6
trillion and has been called the “face of ESG,” wrote a now-infamous
letter to CEOs titled “A Sense of Purpose” that pushed a “new model of
governance” in line with ESG values.
“Society is demanding that companies, both public and private, serve a
social purpose,” Fink wrote. “To prosper over time, every company must
not only deliver financial performance, but also show how it makes a
positive contribution to society.”
Fink also let it be known “that if a company doesn’t engage
with the community and have a sense of purpose “it will ultimately lose
the license to operate from key stakeholders.”