The methodology being used to usher in permanent tyranny: With ‘the masses’ brainwashed beyond belief, more covert draconian measures are rushing in the fascist agenda


Pandemic, epidemic, endemic. What is the difference? Since I am not in the medical field I needed to look these terms up to be sure I had a handle on the differences and similarities of these three terms. According to the old standby Merriam-Webster (and selectively quoting to fit the purpose of this column and keep it shorter), this is what I came up with;

(Article by Alan Barton republished from AllNewsPipeline.com)

Pandemic – adjective

1: occurring over a wide geographic area (such as multiple countries or continents) and typically affecting a significant proportion of the population

2: characterized by very widespread growth or extent

Pandemic – noun

1: an outbreak of a disease that occurs over a wide geographic area (such as multiple countries or continents) and typically affects a significant proportion of the population

2: an outbreak or product of sudden rapid spread, growth, or development

OK, so a pandemic is a disease that affects a wide area and has a lot of infected people, which is easy enough.

Epidemicadjective

1: affecting or tending to affect a disproportionately large number of individuals within a population, community, or region at the same time

2a: excessively prevalent

3: characterized by very widespread growth or extent : of, relating to, or constituting an epidemic

Epidemicnoun

1: an outbreak of disease that spreads quickly and affects many individuals at the same time

2: an outbreak or product of sudden rapid spread, growth, or development

A bit more difficult to put my finger on, but I suppose it means an Epidemic is a Pandemic when it affects a wider area and a lot more people get it; or it is more prevalent, am I right? There are not a lot of differences and it seems that one more often than not reference the same thing.

Now we get to throw a monkey wrench into the mix and figure out what an endemic is.

Endemicadjective

1a: belonging or native to a particular people or country

b: characteristic of or prevalent in a particular field, area, or environment

2: restricted or peculiar to a locality or region

Endemicnoun

: an organism that is restricted or peculiar to a locality or region : an endemic organism

Perhaps I may require a bit more help with this one as it seems to indicate specifically that it is a situation, in this case a pandemic that is limited to a particular region or peoples. So an epidemic of endemic illnesses makes for a pandemic? Please excuse me if I do not understand it correctly, but that is what I get out of it. But that is not really of any great concern with today’s discussion except that there are stories of various states dropping the pandemic label as it appears that the fake Plandemic –err, I meant Pandemic – is waning while the dictators – errr, I meant Governors that have grown to love their tyrannical grasp on absolute power and control so they then declare the plandemic an Endemic for their area. Using the noun description of Endemic it appears to be something (in this case a pandemic) restricted to their own peculiar – umm, I meant particular state, or at least an excuse to maintain pandemic control mechanisms in place even though they may be relaxing somewhat from the harsh but ILLEGAL rules a bit.

Why would I even bring this distinction of terms up? Well, because they did. And by ‘they’ I mean the dictators involved. The actual Cov/SARS farce lasted only a year with this second year being mostly the result of the kill shots and normal flu and cold season, which is waning all by itself regardless of the attempts to mangle the truth enough to keep the farce going.

Let us look at a couple examples of that curiosity of events to illustrate it.

One of the world’s foremost secret satanic societies known as the Council of Foreign Relations asked the question “When Will COVID-19 Become Endemic?” This question got me thinking – what is considered ‘Endemic’ about the plandemic? They give the answer when they said “Epidemiologists say a disease is endemic when its presence becomes steady in a particular region, or at least predictable, as with seasonal influenza. But there’s no consensus on the conditions for meeting this benchmark. By this broad definition, endemicity doesn’t necessarily mean a disease is rare or common, mild or severe. For example, infection rates can still be high; they just have to remain static. Malaria, which is endemic in dozens of countries, mostly in sub-Saharan Africa, killed more than six hundred thousand people in 2020.” That sounds like they are not producing enough Ivermectin to go around and it would be a safe bet that is on purpose.

OK, so they are saying that the disease has reached equilibrium or when there is enough protection from the disease to keep it from blowing out again. They also said that “endemic disease can still (and often does) require a robust policy response” which means that there is no lowering of the standards or edicts that must be met by the population and according to them, that means that the population needs to be ‘vaccinated’ just about entirely, meaning that almost all of the population, all of the people MUST be inoculated with the murderous bio-weapon known as the C19 vaccination. They then go on to explain why they think the push for at least yearly boosters may be required when they said “Governments should be prepared to handle the worst possibilities, such as a case in which the world’s current vaccines are unable to defend against a new variant….The WHO continues to advocate for increasing the global vaccination rate….dedicating more resources to developing new vaccines, particularly genetic material–based ones.” I read that as saying more mRNA bio-weapons need to be developed to murder more people faster; new batches of the killer boosters need to be in the pipeline.

And people obey their shady declarations as though it was the law itself or the gods speaking it.

California becomes 1st state to downgrade pandemic to ‘endemic’” said Yahoo! Fake news and MSN echoed that when they claimed California claims to become the first state to treat the fake plandemic as an endemic. Sorry, but I am still having trouble with the usage of that term. Should that not be an endemic infection, using it as an adjective rather than a proper noun? Must be my bad, the groovy elites have proclaimed it thus. “California’s governor announced a milestone Thursday, saying his state would become the first in the nation to treat the coronavirus as a manageable, endemic risk. His decision marks a significant new phase in the state’s covid response and could be a bellwether as officials elsewhere in the country look to resume a level of normalcy” MSM said and to me used the term more correctly by using the adjective to describe the risk, rather than as a proper noun.

““We are moving past the crisis phase into a phase where we will work to live with this virus,” Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) said at a news conference.

“People are looking forward to turning the page,” he added. “They also need to know we have their back, we’re going to keep them safe, and we’re going to stay on top of this.

California’s plan, he said, shifts from a “crisis mentality” to emphasize prevention and adaptability, allowing officials to step up measures to detect and contain fresh outbreaks, as well as to look out for new variants. It also includes more public campaigns against misinformation and the stockpiling of tests and equipment rather than mask mandates and business shutdowns.

Newsom’s “Smarter” plan (standing for shots, masks, awareness, readiness, testing, education and Rx) includes maintaining a store of 75 million masks, increasing vaccination and daily testing numbers, monitoring wastewater for virus remnants, and responding to surges in cases by quickly bringing in extra medical workers via contracts with national staffing companies.”

Let’s take a closer look at what Gruesome Newsom said. He is admitting that the planned scare is over, but not accepting that his power trip could be over as well. He avows that he will stay on top of the farce to maintain his hold over people’s lives and that reinstatement of the draconian mandates has a high likelihood to be implemented. But worse of all he echoed the DHS declaration that anyone that disagrees, mutters or even thinks anything that could be construed as not in complete acceptance of the New World Orders mandates of accepted thought and speech will be hounded and persecuted and lose their rank in the national good credit score system. Take that you lousy cretins that do not accept our absolute rule and whims as god given laws.

Read more at: AllNewsPipeline.com

Planet Today

Disclaimer: This article only represents the author’s view. PT is not responsible for any legal risks. The material mentions COVID-19. Trust verified information from expert sources — check out answers to questions about coronavirus and vaccinations from doctors, scientists and scientific correspondents. This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author. facebook twitter telegram reddit vk pinterest youtube external-link

Post a Comment

Previous Post Next Post

AD News

AD News

نموذج الاتصال