UK Science advisory committee REGRETS using fear to control people, admit they used “unethical” and “totalitarian” methods

(Planet Today) In March of 2020, the Scientific Pandemic Influenza Group on Behavior instructed government officials across Europe to instill fear in the population and increase “the perceived level of personal threat.” As countries prepared to lock down, the science committee told government ministers “a substantial number of people still do not feel sufficiently [and] personally threatened” by covid-19. In order for the controlling lockdowns to work, the committee instructed government officials to use fear to their advantage.

(Article by Lance D Johnson republished from

Now, just a year later, the Scientific Pandemic Influenza Group on Behavior (SPI-B) REGRETS using fear to control people and admits they used “unethical” and “totalitarian” methods to isolate, defraud and intimidate people into submission.

One of the group’s members, psychologist Gavin Morgan, said, “Clearly, using fear as a means of control is not ethical. Using fear smacks of totalitarianism. It’s not an ethical stance for any modern government.”

Government dictators are beginning to feel the backlash from the public

These confessions come at a time during intense public backlash. The people are accusing their government officials of ramping up fear of infectious disease risk to unlawfully detain individuals and deprive them of their civil liberties. These government fear tactics used intimidation to discriminate and lock down select businesses and activities, coercing people to abide by inconsistent and asinine medical edicts. People across the United Kingdom are clamoring to hold government officials accountable for illegal, totalitarian methods that led to human rights abuses.

UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson has been pressured to announce a public, independent inquiry into the Covid-19 scandal. Johnson confirmed that the Government will establish an independent public inquiry on a statutory basis, with full powers under the Inquiries Act of 2005. This inquiry will take oral evidence in public “under oath” and compel all relevant materials to be produced, beginning in 2022.

SPI-B is the sub-committee that initially fear-mongered to Sir Patrick Vallance, the chief scientific adviser for the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE). The fear mongering was used to manipulate populations to comply with government authorities. One SPI-B scientist testified, “In March [2020] the Government was very worried about compliance and they thought people wouldn’t want to be locked down. There were discussions about fear being needed to encourage compliance, and decisions were made about how to ramp up the fear. The way we have used fear is dystopian. The use of fear has definitely been ethically questionable. It’s been like a weird experiment.”

One SPI-B member admitted that the committee’s purpose is to use psychology for “mind control.” “That’s what we do… clearly we try and go about it in a positive way, but it has been used nefariously in the past,” the member said.

The fear, control and loss of liberty are contributing factors to sickness, hospitalization and death, not solutions

Another SPI-B member said the “pandemic” was used by government to “grab power.” “We have to be very careful about the authoritarianism that is creeping in,” the advisor said. The fear of pathogens and fear of government led to a loss of liberty that was a contributing facto to sickness, hospitalization, and death. The government pretends these methods are for everyone’s “safety” but these methods have not proven to be public health solutions in the slightest. Instead, the control caused public disorder, drug addictions, domestic abuse, overdoses, suicides, high blood pressure, weight gain, and a myriad of health problems that are often the underlying factor for covid-19 mortality.

Indeed, governments inundated the public with only fearful news, broadcasting case counts, but never coming clean about how the covid-19 PCR tests were falsely calibrated with a high cycle to generate an onslaught of false positives. The number of people who recovered was never broadcast either, and no information was provided to encourage a healthy immune response and effective recovery.

The government used data on hospitalizations and deaths, but did not sort out the reasons why people were hospitalized in the first place or discuss the contributing factors that went into their hospital death. Death was used for political gain and to generate more fear, even though medical systems were fraudulently counting people who “died with covid” as people “who died from covid.” The truth was always buried and covered up by an agenda of fear and control. The constant bombardment of fear and control destroyed countless lives, oppressing natural immune function, and making people mentally and physically susceptible to sickness and complications. This is an unacceptable way for governments to treat their people.