In a bold and divisive move, US President Donald Trump announced on August 7, 2025, that he has ordered the Department of Commerce to begin work on a new census that excludes undocumented immigrants from the population count. This directive, shared via a fiery social media post, has reignited a fierce debate about constitutional mandates, electoral fairness, and the human cost of such a policy. Trump’s call for a “new and highly accurate” census, based on “modern day facts and figures” from the 2024 election, aims to reshape voter maps ahead of the 2026 midterm elections, potentially altering the balance of power in Congress and the Electoral College. But at what cost?
A Constitutional Clash: The 14th Amendment and the Census
The US Constitution, since 1790, has mandated a decennial census that counts the “whole number of persons in each state,” explicitly including all residents, regardless of immigration status. This requirement, enshrined in the 14th Amendment, ensures that every individual living in the United States contributes to the apportionment of congressional seats, Electoral College votes, and the allocation of trillions in federal funding for schools, hospitals, and infrastructure. Trump’s proposal to exclude undocumented immigrants directly challenges this constitutional principle, raising legal and ethical questions that could define the nation’s political landscape for decades.
Legal experts, such as Sophia Lin Lakin from the ACLU’s Voting Rights Project, argue that excluding undocumented residents “would defy the Constitution, federal law, and settled precedent.” The Supreme Court, during Trump’s first term, blocked a similar attempt to add a citizenship question to the 2020 census, citing a “contrived” rationale. While the court declined to rule definitively on whether undocumented immigrants could be excluded from apportionment counts, it left the door open for future challenges, setting the stage for what could be a historic legal battle. NPR
Political Maneuvering: Redistricting and the 2026 Midterms
Trump’s directive comes at a critical juncture, as Republican-led states like Texas push for redistricting plans that could secure up to five additional House seats in the 2026 midterms. The White House is pressing these states to draw “more favorable voter maps,” a strategy aimed at bolstering the GOP’s razor-thin House majority, which could flip with just three Democratic gains. In Texas, where population growth has been driven significantly by Latino and Asian American communities, state lawmakers are locked in a contentious battle over new electoral maps. These efforts, backed by Trump, could tilt the political scales in favor of Republicans, but they also risk alienating diverse communities and fueling distrust in the democratic process.
Across the Atlantic, European media outlets have taken note of this development, framing it as part of a broader trend of populist policies. France’s Le Monde reported that Trump’s move “contradicts the constitutional requirement” and aligns with a “longstanding rightwing talking point” that undocumented immigrants unfairly boost the political power of states like California. Similarly, Malaysia’s Free Malaysia Today highlighted the potential for this policy to undermine the accuracy of population counts, particularly among minority communities.
The Human Cost: Fear and Undercounting
Beyond the legal and political implications, Trump’s census proposal carries profound human consequences. A March study in the Journal of Policy Management and Analysis warned that adding a citizenship question could discourage Latino and Asian American households from participating, leading to significant undercounts. In 2020, the Census Bureau reported a 5% undercount of Latino residents and a 3.3% undercount of Black residents, partly attributed to fears stoked by earlier attempts to include a citizenship question. These undercounts have real-world impacts, depriving communities of federal funding for essential services like education and healthcare.
Consider Maria, a single mother in Houston, Texas, who fled violence in Central America and now lives in the US without legal status. “I want my kids to have a better life, but I’m scared to answer questions about my status,” she told a local community organizer. “If they don’t count us, how will our schools get the money they need?” Maria’s story is not unique. Millions of undocumented immigrants and their families live in the shadows, contributing to their communities but fearing government scrutiny. Excluding them from the census could erase their presence, further marginalizing already vulnerable populations.
In California, where an estimated 2 million undocumented immigrants reside, the stakes are particularly high. Community leaders like Juan Gonzalez, who runs a nonprofit in Los Angeles, warn that an undercount could cost the state billions in federal funding. “This isn’t just about politics—it’s about people’s lives,” Gonzalez said. “Hospitals, schools, roads—they all depend on accurate census data. If you erase people, you erase their future.”
A Global Perspective: Lessons from Abroad
The debate over who gets counted in a national census is not unique to the United States. In Canada, the 2021 census faced criticism for undercounting Indigenous populations, leading to calls for more inclusive methodologies. CBC News reported that these undercounts resulted in reduced funding for Indigenous communities, highlighting the universal importance of accurate population data. Similarly, in India, delays in the 2021 census due to the COVID-19 pandemic sparked concerns about outdated electoral maps and resource allocation, as noted by The Hindu.
These international examples underscore the ripple effects of census policies. In the US, the exclusion of undocumented immigrants could disproportionately harm states with diverse populations, such as California, Texas, and Florida. According to the Pew Research Center, excluding undocumented immigrants in 2020 would have cost these states one House seat each, shifting political power to less diverse regions. Pew Research Center
Republican Strategy and Democratic Pushback
Trump’s census directive aligns with broader Republican efforts to reshape electoral maps. In Congress, GOP lawmakers have introduced bills like the Equal Representation Act, which seeks to exclude noncitizens from apportionment counts. Senator Bill Hagerty of Tennessee, a co-sponsor, argued that “it is unconscionable that illegal immigrants and non-citizens are counted toward congressional district apportionment and our electoral map.” Meanwhile, Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia has proposed a new census and redistricting before 2030, a move Trump has endorsed. NPR
Democrats, however, are not standing idly by. Representatives like Grace Meng of New York and Mazie Hirono of Hawaii have led efforts to block these proposals, citing their potential to disenfranchise immigrant communities. In a letter to congressional leaders, Meng warned that excluding noncitizens could “affirm the fears of undocumented immigrants and immigrants with legal status that registering with the government could lead to deportation.” Democrats in states like New York and California are also exploring their own redistricting plans to counter Republican gains, setting the stage for a high-stakes showdown in 2026.
The Road to 2030: Uncertainty and Opportunity
The Census Bureau has already begun planning for the 2030 census, with field tests scheduled for 2026. Trump’s directive raises questions about whether he seeks to alter the 2030 count or conduct an unprecedented mid-decade census. Either way, the logistical challenges are immense. As noted by census expert John Wice, “The decennial census is the second-biggest undertaking by the federal government, second only to the military at wartime.” CNN
Moreover, the political landscape could shift dramatically by 2030. The Brennan Center for Justice projects that population growth in the South, driven largely by Black, Latino, and Asian populations, could lead to significant gains in House seats for states like Texas and Florida. However, mass deportation policies or reduced immigration could alter these projections, affecting both red and blue states. Brennan Center
A Call to Action: Why This Matters
Trump’s census proposal is more than a policy debate—it’s a question of who counts in America. Excluding undocumented immigrants risks silencing millions of voices, undermining the democratic principle that every person matters. It could also deepen divisions in an already polarized nation, pitting communities against one another in a zero-sum game of political power. As the 2026 midterms approach, the stakes could not be higher.
Readers, what do you think? Should the census count every resident, as the Constitution mandates, or should it exclude undocumented immigrants? Share your thoughts in the comments below and join the conversation on Planet-Today.com.
Comments
Share your opinion on this topic! Do you believe the census should include all residents, or should it focus solely on citizens? Let us know below.